My Thoughts
Why Your Team Talks Past Each Other (And How I Finally Fixed Mine)
Related Reading: Why Professional Development Courses Are Essential for Career Growth | The Role of Professional Development in a Changing Job Market | Why Companies Should Invest in Professional Development
The conference room fell dead silent when Sarah from accounts asked James from IT to "please speak English" during his explanation of our new software rollout. That was three years ago, and honestly, it was the moment I realised our workplace communication wasn't just poor—it was downright toxic.
I've been running training workshops for nearly two decades now, and I'll tell you something that might ruffle some feathers: most communication problems aren't about people being difficult. They're about organisations being lazy with their standards and expectations. We throw people together, give them a Slack channel, and expect magic to happen.
The Real Problem Nobody Talks About
Here's what I've observed across hundreds of Australian workplaces—from mining companies in Perth to tech startups in Melbourne. Communication breaks down because we've created these weird tribal languages within departments. Finance speaks in acronyms, IT lives in technical jargon, and don't get me started on marketing's obsession with made-up words that sound like someone sneezed while saying "synergy."
The solution isn't more email etiquette courses. Trust me, I've sat through enough of those to know they're about as useful as a screen door on a submarine.
What actually works is something I stumbled onto by accident during a particularly disastrous team meeting in 2019. One of my clients—a mid-sized logistics company—was hemorrhaging staff because nobody could agree on project priorities. Deadlines were being missed left and right. The CEO was ready to fire half the management team.
Instead of another PowerPoint presentation about "active listening" (which, let's be honest, just makes people nod more while still not listening), I tried something different.
The Translation Exercise That Changed Everything
I divided their team into pairs from different departments and gave them what I called "translation assignments." Each person had to explain their current biggest work challenge using only words their grandmother would understand. No industry jargon. No internal company speak. Just plain, simple English.
The results were extraordinary. Within twenty minutes, the warehouse manager realised the finance team's "cash flow concerns" weren't personal attacks on his ordering decisions—they were genuine budget constraints he'd never properly understood. The marketing coordinator discovered that IT's "bandwidth limitations" weren't excuses to avoid her requests, but actual technical bottlenecks that affected the entire company.
But here's the controversial bit that some people don't want to hear: not everyone deserves equal speaking time in every meeting. I said it. Some voices matter more than others depending on the topic, and pretending otherwise is just inefficient democratic nonsense that wastes everyone's time.
Why Most Training Gets It Wrong
The training industry loves to sell comprehensive communication packages that cover everything from email etiquette to presentation skills. But here's what I've learned: people don't need to be great at everything. They need to be competent at the basics and excellent at one or two communication methods that suit their role.
Your accountant doesn't need to be a charismatic public speaker. Your sales team doesn't need to write academic-level reports. Stop trying to turn everyone into communication generalists when what you really need are specialists who can translate when necessary.
I made this mistake myself for years, designing these elaborate training programs that tried to address every possible communication scenario. Complete waste of time and money. The companies that saw real improvement focused on just three core areas:
- Clear request-making (asking for what you actually need)
- Context-setting (explaining why something matters)
- Confirmation protocols (making sure the message landed correctly)
That's it. Master those three things and 80% of your communication problems disappear overnight.
The Australian Context Nobody Mentions
Working in Australia adds another layer of complexity that most international training programs completely ignore. We've got this cultural thing where being too direct is considered rude, but being too indirect means nothing gets done. It's a delicate balance that drives overseas managers absolutely mental.
I watched an American executive nearly have a breakdown trying to get straight answers from his Sydney team. In his culture, "I'll look into that" means "I'll look into that." In ours, it often means "I'm politely telling you to bugger off."
We need to acknowledge these cultural nuances instead of pretending they don't exist. Some of the most effective communication training I've delivered specifically addressed Australian workplace culture and how to navigate it without losing your authentic voice.
The solution isn't to become more American in our communication style—God knows we don't need that. It's to be more explicit about what our phrases actually mean and create shared understanding within teams.
What Actually Works (Based on Real Results)
After implementing communication improvements across more than 200 Australian businesses, here's what consistently moves the needle:
Regular translation check-ins. Not meetings about meetings, but brief sessions where team members explain current projects in everyday language. Ten minutes every fortnight. That's it.
Role-specific communication standards. Your customer service team needs different skills than your engineering department. Stop treating them the same.
The 24-hour rule for emotional responses. Any message written in anger sits in drafts for a day before sending. This single rule has prevented more workplace drama than any conflict resolution workshop I've ever run.
Context documentation. When someone makes a request, they must include why it matters and what happens if it doesn't get done. Not negotiable.
And here's something that might surprise you: encourage people to admit when they don't understand something immediately. Create psychological safety around confusion. Most communication problems stem from people nodding along when they're actually lost.
The Pushback You'll Get (And How to Handle It)
Whenever I suggest these changes, I get the same three objections:
"We don't have time for all this translation stuff." Yes, you do. You're already spending twice as long fixing miscommunications. This just front-loads the clarity.
"Our industry is too technical for simple language." Rubbish. If you can't explain your work to a smart non-expert, you probably don't understand it as well as you think you do.
"This feels like dumbing things down." It's not dumbing down—it's being professional enough to ensure your message lands with your intended audience.
The companies that resist these changes are usually the ones desperately needing them. There's often one or two senior people who've built their entire identity around being the only ones who understand the complex jargon. They see clear communication as a threat to their value.
Deal with them directly and privately. Don't try to change their minds in group settings.
Beyond the Obvious Solutions
Most communication advice stops at the surface level. "Use clear language." "Listen actively." "Ask questions." All true, but incomplete.
What really transforms workplace communication is addressing the underlying systems that create communication problems in the first place. Things like:
- Meeting structures that encourage grandstanding over problem-solving
- Email cultures where hitting "reply all" is the default
- Hierarchical reporting that filters bad news out of existence
- Performance metrics that reward looking busy over being effective
I've seen organisations spend thousands on emotional intelligence training while maintaining meeting schedules that would drive anyone to emotional breakdown. You can't train your way out of systemic dysfunction.
The best communication improvements I've implemented weren't training programs at all—they were structural changes to how information flowed through the organisation. Sometimes the answer isn't better communication skills; it's fewer communication touchpoints.
My Biggest Mistakes (So You Don't Repeat Them)
Early in my career, I thought more communication was always better. I designed these elaborate feedback systems where everyone was supposed to share everything with everyone else. Complete disaster. Information overload is real, and it kills effective communication faster than any language barrier.
I also used to believe that communication styles were fixed personality traits. "John's just not a verbal processor." "Sarah prefers written communication." While preferences exist, treating them as immutable characteristics limits people's growth and creates unnecessary workarounds.
Most people can develop competence in multiple communication styles if you give them proper instruction and enough practice. The key is meeting them where they are initially, not where you think they should be.
The Results That Matter
Three years after that disastrous meeting between Sarah and James, their company had reduced project delays by 40% and employee turnover by 60%. Not because everyone became communication experts, but because they established clear standards and stuck to them consistently.
Sarah learned to ask clarifying questions instead of making sarcastic comments. James learned to start technical explanations with the business impact before diving into details. Neither of them became different people—they just developed better professional habits.
That's what effective workplace communication really is: better habits consistently applied across an organisation. Not personality makeovers or revolutionary new frameworks. Just clear standards, regular practice, and the discipline to maintain them even when things get busy.
The companies that understand this simple truth are the ones where people actually want to work. Everything else is just expensive noise that sounds good in boardroom presentations but changes nothing on the ground.
And honestly? That's exactly how it should be.
Connect With Us: Corporate Communication Skills Training | Effective Communication Training | Team Development Training | Communication Training Brisbane | Workplace Communication Training